A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos de procedencia excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de adición y complementación del Auto 336/20.
El memorialista argumentó que en la providencia de la referencia existen omisiones inexplicables en temas necesarios, según la propia voluntad de la Constitución.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR, por manifiestamente improcedente la petición formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por manifiestamente improcedente la solicitud "integra de adición y complementación" del Auto 336 de 2020 presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Luis Pabón Apicella.
- SEGUNDO. APLICAR el artículo 19 de la Ley 1755 de 2015 en concordancia con el literal d) del título II de la Circular 6 de 2018 frente a futuras peticiones o escritos repetitivos.
- TERCERO. NOTIFÍQUESE la presenta providencia al solicitante e infórmesele que contra la misma no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.